Autostrade per l'Italia wins the "Tutor war" - 14 August 2019

The Supreme Court sided with Autostrade per l'Italia, a Benetton Group company in litigation brought by a Tuscan company, which had claimed that Autostrade per l'Italia infringed one of its patents. Thus concludes a legal battle that has been ongoing for several years.

The Supreme Court found that the Tutors - machines for measuring vehicle speed - installed by Autostrade per l'Italia in various parts of its road network do not violate the Tuscan company's patent, and therefore can continue to remain in function. The Court's decision overturns the conclusions reached by the Court of Appeal of Rome just over a year ago.

The judges of the Supreme Court, who had already issued a previous decision on this subject matter, accepted the arguments set forth by counsel for Autostrade per l'Italia, Giuseppe Bernardi, Lucio Ghia and Fabrizio Jacobacci. Autostrade per l'Italia is the largest Italian operator of motorway sections (managing almost 3 thousand kilometers of roadways), and belongs to the Benetton family. The ltigation was initiated by a company from the Tuscan town of Greve in Chianti, Craft S.r.l., which sought, among other things, compensation for damages, which had already been denied by the lower courts, and which was in the early stages of this dispute defended by the law firm of the current Italian Prime Minister, Giuseppe Conte. Craft started this lengthy legal battle, in which the first decision was issued in 2008, alleging the infringement of one of its patents that, using the principle of average speed and two remote stations connected with a central computer, detects and identifies vehicles that travel over the speed limit by the optical reading of the license plate.

The conclusion of the long-standing "Tutor war" follows victories by Autostrade per l'Italia in the first two court instances. Then, following a first postponement of the Supreme Court proceedings, the Court of Appeal of Rome issued a decision finding that Craft's patent was infringed by Autostrade per l'Italia's use of the Tutor devices and even ordered destruction of the same. Thanks to continued opposition by Autostrade per l'Italia's defense team, the destruction of the Tutor devices was avoided.

According to the Supreme Court's decision on August 14th, the device described in Craft's patent and the Autostrade per l'Italia devices - the SICVe (developed in the early 2000s) - utilise "two separate vehicle detection systems "(one that is optical, while the other is inductive / magnetic) and, therefore, there was no infringement.

On the Autostrade per l'Italia road network, the Tutor devices can therefore continue to perform their functions of identifying and deterring excessive speed. Since the installation of the Tutor devices, the Traffic Police has been able to issue millions of tickets for speeding offences and the Italian State has collected billions of Euros in fines.

Sampling and Copyright - 29 July 2019

The Court of Justice issued its preliminary ruling in a case concerning the sampling of a fragment of a song, Kraftwerk's Metall auf Metall, by a German producer. Producers' rights under Directive 2001/29 are assessed, as well as the possible application of exceptions and limitations, based on art. 5 of the Directive.

Freedom of expression in trademark law - 2 July 2019

Opinion of CJEU Advocate General Bobek in case C-240/18, “Fack Ju Göhte”, concerning freedom of expression in trademark law and the appropriate assessment of public policy and morality principles, under art. 7(f) of Regulation (EC) 207/2009. For additional info, click on READ MORE.

Adidas loses one among its three-stripe marks - 19 June 2019

CJEU, T-307/17: one among Adidas' three-stripe marks declared invalid by the EU General Court, which upheld the EUIPO’s invalidity decision, based on lack of inherent and acquired distinctive character. For additional info, click on READ MORE.

The monitoring and removal obligation of the host provider - 4 June 2019

On 4 June 2019, the CJEU ruled that, under Art. 15 (1) of Dir. 2000/31/EC, a Member State’s Court injunction may include the order for the host provider to remove information identical or, to some extent, equivalent to that found illegal – also worldwide, subject to applicable public and private international law. For additional info, click on READ MORE.

The importance of being famous: quality is not enough without reputation - 11 April 2019

On April 11, 2019, in Öko-Test Verlag v Dr. Liebe (C‑690/17), the CJEU ruled on the scope of protection of an individual mark relating to quality labels associated with test results. The request for a preliminary ruling was submitted by the Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf. For additional info, click on READ MORE

Formula E – Trademark owner loses race against time, 10 April 2019

On April 10, 2019, in The Green Effort Limited v EUIPO (C‑282/18P), the CJEU upheld the General Court’s earlier decision and, therefore, The Green Effort lost its rights on the word trademark “Formula E”. For additional info, click on READ MORE

Figurative or Colour Mark – an important distinction for #trademark applications, 27 March 2019

On March 27, 2019, in Oy Hartwall Ab v Patentti- ja rekisterihallitus (C‑578/17), the #CJEU ruled on the relevance of the classification as a “colour mark” or “figurative mark” in trademark applications. The request for a preliminary ruling was submitted by the Supreme Administrative Court of Finland.
The applicant sought to register, with the Finnish Intellectual Property Office, a colour mark, which was represented by a colour drawing with the shape of a banner.
For additional info, click on READ MORE

After Louboutin, the “Manhattan" case provides further clarification on absolute grounds of refusal - 14 March 2019

On March 14, 2019, the CJEU ruled on two questions, concerning absolute grounds of refusal of a EUTM, submitted by the Court of Appeal of Stockholm in the case Textilis – Keskin v Svenskt Tenn (C-21/18).  For additional info, click on READ MORE

The conflict between shape and sweets, according to the CJEU - 6 March 2019

On March 6, 2019, the CJEU ruled on the invalidity of a Community design based on an earlier figurative trademark in BMB v EUIPO - Ferrero (C-693/17P).
Both the registered design, owned by BMB, and the trademark at issue, Ferrero’s international registration that goes back to 1974, represent a container for sweets. For additional info, click on READ MORE